From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 18:54:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4A116A4B3 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from procyon.firepipe.net (procyon.firepipe.net [198.78.66.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8647B43F3F for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:54:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by procyon.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 52C0E20A7F; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 18:54:04 -0700 From: Will Andrews To: Barney Wolff Message-ID: <20031004015404.GW72999@procyon.firepipe.net> Mail-Followup-To: Barney Wolff , current@freebsd.org References: <20031004014527.GB32411@pit.databus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031004014527.GB32411@pit.databus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [security-advisories@freebsd.org: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:17.procfs] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 01:54:06 -0000 On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:45:27PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote: > I'm finally motivated to ask, why don't security advisories contain > the equivalent revs for -head? Surely I can't be the only person > following -current who doesn't build every day. Simply because the SO does not support -CURRENT. Regards, -- wca