From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 20 14:28:49 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C9537B401 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:28:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com [192.25.240.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAE943FB1 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:28:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from darrylo@soco.agilent.com) Received: from relcos1.cos.agilent.com (relcos1.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.239]) by msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA5B13A98; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:28:47 -0700 (MST) Received: from mina.soco.agilent.com (mina.soco.agilent.com [141.121.54.157]) by relcos1.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7235CE; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:28:46 -0700 (MST) Received: from mina.soco.agilent.com (darrylo@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mina.soco.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_25184)/8.9.3 SMKit7.1.1_Agilent) with ESMTP id OAA03775; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:28:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200302202228.OAA03775@mina.soco.agilent.com> To: kalts@estpak.ee Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: background fsck deadlocks with ufs2 and big disk Reply-To: Darryl Okahata In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 20 Feb 2003 22:03:17 +0200." <20030220200317.GA5136@kevad.internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.7) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:28:45 -0800 From: Darryl Okahata Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Vallo Kallaste wrote: > I'll second Brad's statement about vinum and softupdates > interactions. My last experiments with vinum were more than half a > year ago, but I guess it still holds. BTW, the interactions showed > up _only_ on R5 volumes. I had 6 disk (SCSI) R5 volume in Compaq > Proliant 3000 and the system was very stable before I enabled > softupdates.. and of course after I disabled softupdates. In between > there were crashes and nasty problems with filesystem. Unfortunately > it was production system and I hadn't chanche to play. Did you believe that the crashes were caused by enabling softupdates on an R5 vinum volume, or were the crashes unrelated to vinum/softupdates? I can see how crashes unrelated to vinum/softupdates might trash vinum filesystems. -- Darryl Okahata darrylo@soco.agilent.com DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or of the little green men that have been following him all day. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message