From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 9 19:40:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FEE106566C for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 19:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B96A8FC12 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 19:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by faar19 with SMTP id r19so2852406faa.13 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:40:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rYHpIoJJiwAg7Y/BlcwNvpBjztNbWmVEGxbOwuh/eB4=; b=BRXAz0+NK86DKwx0Jsj6Dbb5BpzurXJiW4kDI87VKHTJWxH8oArKuXhOFP0ZZbHdxO TDab/40dP4V0AmXmqBltNB9lAR8lrwWPqM5rmNWZAO6IgAivoGbjkG4rVHFmlORazc+H HgdUN4sOvVz1lK2Kp3fSfg7pXeZSlilRB2cD8= Received: by 10.223.7.14 with SMTP id b14mr6978184fab.10.1320867605549; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:40:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.150] (athedsl-4364788.home.otenet.gr. [79.130.9.228]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5sm7851001faf.14.2011.11.09.11.40.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:40:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EBAD71B.8080009@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:40:11 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <20111104144300.GF83971@goofy01.vnodelab.local> <20111108203811.GG83971@goofy01.vnodelab.local> <20111108204806.GH83971@goofy01.vnodelab.local> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD developers / committers list X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:40:07 -0000 On 9/11/2011 9:27 μμ, Chris Rees wrote: > There we go, I'm pretty sure it's OK now :) > > Thanks for the extra info. > > Anyone else any problems? One developer emailed to suggest he'd rather > do it on first/last commit date, and while I understand where he's > coming from, it's not what was done in the past apparently.... Does > anyone have any strong feelings on the matter? First commit date would be - in most cases - pretty close to what is in the access file (as new committers have to add themselves to several files, news etc). The end date may actually be way off as accounts usually "time out" after 1 year (instead of been closed manually), so this makes sense. I don't think it's very important though. > The current patch goes > on going into and out of the respective access files. > > Chris > And this is good enough! Thanks for undertaking this tedious task.