From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Apr 18 10:53:07 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA12775
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 10:53:07 -0700
Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA12764
          ; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 10:52:54 -0700
Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de with SMTP
	(5.67b+/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) id AA23044; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 19:51:13 +0200
Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP
	id TAA01625; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 19:51:11 +0200
Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id TAA04056; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 19:27:11 +0200
From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Message-Id: <199504181727.TAA04056@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Subject: Re: pcemu
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 19:27:10 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: joerg@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199504180720.AAA02954@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=" at Apr 18, 95 00:20:05 am
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Length: 1009      
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

As Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?= wrote:
> 
> Not that it matters much, but the "-DLITTLE_ENDIAN" is generating a
> flood of warnings.....

j@uriah 263% more /usr/ports/utils/pcemu/Makefile
...
# Warning notice:  by now, you'll have to live with those warnings:
#
#In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:48,
#                 from /usr/include/stdio.h:43,
#                 from main.c:22:
#/usr/include/machine/endian.h:50: warning: `LITTLE_ENDIAN' redefined
#*Initialization*:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
...
:-)

They are benign for us (since we're using a little-endian machine),
but they are not so easy to fix since larger parts of the code rely on
#ifdef LITTLE_ENDIAN doing the right thing...  The BSD way to go were
#if BYTE_ORDER == LITTLE_ENDIAN, however.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)