Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:07:41 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "James E. Housley" <jeh@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: installing multiple kernels Message-ID: <xzpsmf59i0y.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <407ED533.5020102@FreeBSD.org> (James E. Housley's message of "Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:32:19 -0400") References: <xzpfzb5qpqe.fsf@dwp.des.no> <407ED533.5020102@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"James E. Housley" <jeh@FreeBSD.org> writes: > But isn't changing to use the last kernel instead of the first kernel > a violation of POLA? Other then that this sounds great. Yes, but it's hard to work around. We have to default to the most recent kernel, but Makefile.inc1 currently assumes that the first kernel listed is the one to use, so we somehow have to make sure it is installed last - or have Makefile.inc1 run regkernel.sh to force the issue. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpsmf59i0y.fsf>