From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 29 19:58:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA01451 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 29 Jan 1998 19:58:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA01405 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 1998 19:58:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA01309; Thu, 29 Jan 1998 19:58:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 19:58:01 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Gary Lahr cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Year 2000 compliance In-Reply-To: <01bd2b54$c5f9eda0$7b547e8b@lahrg.atlanta.ds.adp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe questions" On Tue, 27 Jan 1998, Gary Lahr wrote: > Is FreeBSD version 2.1.0 year 2000 compliant? I searched the web site and I > couldn't find any definite answers on the subject. You missed the mail archives -- I've answered this several times already. To answer the question, yes, the system should be okay since it uses seconds since 1/1/1970 to track time, but user programs are the places you *really* need to worry about. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major