From nobody Tue Sep 26 23:07:23 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RwFl00YM5z4vmyX for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 23:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www121.sakura.ne.jp (www121.sakura.ne.jp [153.125.133.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RwFkz4mhpz4KZD for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 23:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from kalamity.joker.local (123-1-80-101.area1b.commufa.jp [123.1.80.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by www121.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1/[SAKURA-WEB]/20201212) with ESMTPA id 38QN7NX6022238; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 08:07:24 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 08:07:23 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: Cy Schubert Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: revision not displayed in a2440348eed7 Message-Id: <20230927080723.f5157f938803c47a4185d431@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20230926221946.4F2C1623@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <202309260107.38Q17Vp0047265@kx.truefc.org> <202309260629.38Q6T018051416@kx.truefc.org> <20230926181845.539e5816fbef80efda6162ec@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <202309261130.38QBUsLF053699@kx.truefc.org> <4c348f85-d99c-c7c3-5e1a-a435983b720b@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> <20230926231431.20f42fec1075c3980446c50a@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <20230926221946.4F2C1623@slippy.cwsent.com> Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7684, ipnet:153.125.128.0/18, country:JP] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4RwFkz4mhpz4KZD On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:19:46 -0700 Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <20230926231431.20f42fec1075c3980446c50a@dec.sakura.ne.jp>, > Tomoaki > AOKI writes: > > On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 15:48:50 +0200 > > Marek Zarychta wrote: > > > > > W dniu 26.09.2023 o 13:30, KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko pisze: > > > > At least up to 15.0-CURRENT, nothing has happend by > > > > WITHOUT_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD=yes. Something has changed in > > > > 15.0-CURRENT at some time. I've rebuilded with 3fb80f1476c7, > > > > but revision not showed by `uname -a' ;-( > > > > > > > > What changed ???? > > > > > > Nothing changed. Perhaps your build system can't check git hash ? If > > > your sources are from git repository, you need at least git-lite > > > installed and full git repository available on build machine. If you > > > checked out the repository with gitup and have gitup installed, it > > > should also work. It won't work if your build machine has access  to > > > only a part of the repository like worktree. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > -- > > > Marek Zarychta > > > > Just a possibility, but copying src tree to directory other than the > > directory where checked out from git repo and building there could > > lose track with git hash. > > > > Another possibility is that if you build src with any user other than > > the one owning local (pulled) git repo could also lose track with git > > hash. For example, if I `git log HEAD` with regular user and the local > > repo is pulled by root, it fails. No special configuration is done. > > > > % git log HEAD > > fatal: detected dubious ownership in repository at '/usr/src' > > To add an exception for this directory, call: > > > > git config --global --add safe.directory /usr/src > > > > > > This could be due to e6dc6a27230, which was committed this morning. There > is discussion on the src commits ML (dev-commits-src-all, > dev-commits-src-main) about reverting the change. > > > -- > Cheers, > Cy Schubert > FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org > NTP: Web: https://nwtime.org > > e^(i*pi)+1=0 Would be unrelated here, unfortunately. As the subject says, the commit the original reporter is bitten at (not bi-sected) is at a2440348eed7, which is before e6dc6a27230. -- Tomoaki AOKI