From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 2 21:41:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDBD16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 21:41:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from barton.dreadbsd.org (massena-4-82-67-196-50.fbx.proxad.net [82.67.196.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DBE43D55 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 21:41:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from antoine@massena-4-82-67-196-50.fbx.proxad.net) Received: from barton.dreadbsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by barton.dreadbsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j32Lfhki000852; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:41:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from antoine@massena-4-82-67-196-50.fbx.proxad.net) Received: (from antoine@localhost) by barton.dreadbsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j32LfgkT000851; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:41:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from antoine) Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 23:41:42 +0200 From: Antoine Brodin To: Nate Lawson Message-Id: <20050402234142.440b3449.antoine.brodin@laposte.net> In-Reply-To: <424EF205.6010202@root.org> References: <6.2.1.2.0.20050329143237.02f15990@64.7.153.2> <20050329154013.B52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <20050330104117.A52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <20050330123458.T52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <424C41C3.50705@root.org> <20050402111839.GA847@h1.d> <424EF205.6010202@root.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.7 (GTK+ 2.6.4; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: k-gleb@yandex.ru cc: dan.cojocar@gmail.com Subject: Re: Interrupt storm X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:41:50 -0000 Nate Lawson wrote: > I'm a little confused. I don't know of anyone that has problems with > the 6-current PCI irq code that works on 5-stable (which is what your > cvs command updates it to). > > Do either of you have a problem with irq routing on 6-current that works > on 5-stable? Please send details if so. Hi, I have this problem too, but since it's on a desktop I didn't really care about acpi. Here are some details: current with pci irq code from 23-Nov-2004 dmesg: http://bsd.miki.eu.org/~antoine/current+oldacpi.dmesg current with current pci irq code dmesg: http://bsd.miki.eu.org/~antoine/current+acpi.dmesg (there are timeouts and interrupt storms) acpi tables and asl: http://bsd.miki.eu.org/~antoine/acpidump Cheers, Antoine