Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:25:25 +0200 From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@freebsd.org> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all <svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head <svn-ports-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r473793 - in head/devel: . cwrap nss_wrapper pam_wrapper resolv_wrapper socket_wrapper uid_wrapper Message-ID: <CALdFvJGLzia8W3s1evTRYJkrrZqXfr6B8jHhvXS_CbrNes%2BA=g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2bc92a3f-371c-f0a6-dda1-ebed96617295@rawbw.com> References: <201807030329.w633ThS8056768@repo.freebsd.org> <20180703065839.2oqenluilcdzkl6d@atuin.in.mat.cc> <2bc92a3f-371c-f0a6-dda1-ebed96617295@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3 July 2018 at 09:49, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> wrote: > On 07/02/18 23:58, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> Fun fact, TEST_TARGET may not do what you think it does. What it does >> is tell the framework that the target to run when running `make test` is >> test, which will probably fail if the TEST option is not enabled. What >> you may have meant to set was TEST_TEST_TARGET, which sets TEST_TARGET >> when the TEST option is enabled. >> > > > The option TEST shouldn't be needed. What does it mean when the port is > installed? > > You can have a test target without this option. > This is a TEST suite. It has to, at minimum, validate itself. If that fails, how can you trust it's results in the first place?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALdFvJGLzia8W3s1evTRYJkrrZqXfr6B8jHhvXS_CbrNes%2BA=g>