From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 25 11:24:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F894AE; Sat, 25 May 2013 11:24:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com (mail-ee0-f41.google.com [74.125.83.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C7DCB9; Sat, 25 May 2013 11:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id d4so3135207eek.0 for ; Sat, 25 May 2013 04:24:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=UbXzr8+OZlHGiSX00IG9RlbgFxuyFGmNiM28NZAlTnc=; b=Sz+VywGfDCPbbm7JxaZTWUzwwVz7agvNCmzgGHBnC/pgVIwJmnZrVTo6LOCO5abpAD 7lxD+Ksp9ZthpiGT9kQFaS8F+tsCFkVRDk3IjcPk5Zlb4V0E+XF78T6HcfLuSq7jzyI/ grtfIlSbIMuqYlXKFTFiQ4jtK0Gmirv5h0TRf+aQE9KR5UrZg99xHYhLJTqkMYfgEIiF CvnJhQHDUDLb/ChvLePqzkUu/CnnAKBKnouBpaq3IDU4kUV2h7Pf2k563OgUGZ6/yqUG IkUcxOSHKOEyztmrqEbcos+aCtCciGfpk/CYxLhENNi0/O+SzMesZedrm5Edl01MPtm4 SKMQ== X-Received: by 10.14.174.8 with SMTP id w8mr3292696eel.115.1369481088149; Sat, 25 May 2013 04:24:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.15.23.76 with HTTP; Sat, 25 May 2013 04:24:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51A09858.4060803@daemonic.se> References: <20130524212318.B967FE6739@smtp.hushmail.com> <51A09858.4060803@daemonic.se> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 12:24:18 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Omb4AsWqj3SpBK79k8Ouyi_PdKY Message-ID: Subject: Re: The vim port needs a refresh To: Niclas Zeising Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Kenta Suzumoto , "ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 11:24:55 -0000 On 25 May 2013 11:54, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 05/25/13 10:50, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> Alternatively, perhaps we need an editors/vim-options port???? > > Just for the record, editors/vim was (and shells/bash) was converted to > optionsNG not too long ago. Ah, that's at least some good news. I notice that it was on yet another maintainer timeout, so that criticism stands. It appears that David is no longer interested. Chris