Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:15:07 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Is ZFS production ready?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211707570.3361@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BD9QhsyOh34SghWzQPpnTig%2BUmSEO2VP7jfPxTXs9zW9Uakeg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <CAPj0R5Kmi-%2BdJ7mPvTrTAoS8O983svOyR2WyK2_v1Cr07dSS_A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211413140.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhuQ%2BbxKW9%2BdX%2BzS9mErwz8JSkV2G7qL0KfB8BH_LGJAgA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211539230.2903@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhvR_eKtVxdKcaMyOS7tLw_AOHKgUy3o7mJn2b=chMA0Xw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211619250.3092@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhvwKZm7heoe7tpfhYCJvkknw_HC7aFjCu%2B-1xYQBmV6ng@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211644350.3170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhsyOh34SghWzQPpnTig%2BUmSEO2VP7jfPxTXs9zW9Uakeg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> I do understand your setup but I dont have too agree that it is a good

so i would repeat my question.
Assume you have 48 disks, in mirrored configuration (24 mirrors) and 480 
users with their data on them.

Your solution with ZFS - ZFS crashes or you get double disk failure.
Assuming the latter by average one per 24 file (randomly chosen) is 
destroyed which - in practice and limited time, means everything 
destroyed. Actually more than one per 24 - large files can be spread over.

Your solution with UFS - better as there is fsck which slowly but 
successfully repairs problem. with double disk failure - the same!


You restore everything from backup (i assume you have one). This takes 
like a day or more, one or two complete work days lost+all users in 
practice lost everything  since last backup.

My solution with UFS - fsck in case of failure work in parallel on 24 
disks so not that long. double disk failure means losing data of 1/24 
users.

every one per 24 user cannot work, others work and i without any stress do 
recover this 1/24 of users data from backup after putting replacement 
disks.

1/24 of users lost data since last backup, and some hours of time.


Even assuming ZFS is perfect then we both have problems as often, but my 
problems are 1/24 as severe as yours.


Just don't ask me for help when unhappy users will want to cut off your 
head.

>> And you've never seen me, yet i still exist.
>>
>
> Really? that's you anwser to my question. The most childish answer I could

stupid answer to stupid question.
You never seen - but they do happens.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211707570.3361>