From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Mar 11 9:24:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD1037B400 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:24:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2BHNrnp004253; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:23:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: Harti Brandt , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Increasing the size of dev_t and ino_t In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:19:45 EST." Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 18:23:53 +0100 Message-ID: <4252.1015867433@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Garance A Drosihn writes: >At 5:22 PM +0100 3/11/02, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >>As I said: "Just because we can doesn't mean we will >>or should". > >Okay. I had misunderstood what you were saying in the >earlier message. As long as it works for the AFS/ARLA >case I'll be happy. I get a little uneasy about these >things, because I expect that very few freebsd'ers work >in an AFS world, and solutions which will be perfectly >fine for NFS mounts might have scaling problems when >used for AFS. But you could do me a favour: Write up a piece of text which gives enough info for somebody like me to setup and test AFS/ARLA in my lab... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message