From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 27 5:14:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from midget.dons.net.au (daniel.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.137.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C052937B542 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 05:14:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from darius@midget.dons.net.au) Received: (from darius@localhost) by midget.dons.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.1) id XAA11098; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 23:43:26 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from darius) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 23:43:25 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Chuck Robey Subject: Re: kdelibs port broken? Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Maxim Sobolev , bwoods2@uswest.net, Joel Ray Holveck , Will Andrews , Alex Zepeda Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 27-Feb-00 Chuck Robey wrote: > fine example, tho. We break the location of the config files that all > tcl > packages rely upon to build, for the purpose of allowing folks to run > multiple versions simultaneously. Tcl isn't the only one like that, > either. Anyone who wants to be able to build other tcl software that > isn't derived from a port would be well advised to avoid using our port. This is done because none of those programs/libs developed a system on their own which allowed multiple versions to be on the same machine OR made SURE that they where backward compatible.. Its not the ports collection thats at fault, the people who did it this way are cleaning up the mess made by other coders. This happens for tcl, gtk, qt.. There are quite a number. (at least 3! ;) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message