From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 15 02:22:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9762E106568B for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f191.google.com (mail-qy0-f191.google.com [209.85.221.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5136C8FC45 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so1514891qyk.3 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:22:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:message-id; bh=iZUaMrMiPby/rPLwcoVyPtzrGcxu2foRWmQyNumpFrI=; b=VvZpmcmed9noaewJopOUwBtl/zPgdRATKfGLazqO3ZD4QA5FU3UzXS0JBZuOUtfKR4 rLcEhUL62riyui2sb7uWUOxD2V00Mt5hym719KBmcLScE/ZdUTV/ul8e326o9OSB4O9s 4SUIHtsOv8QTgiYp9lW6YJeg3HDUw5CQIcbTs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=VNuB8RvBISMMDnN9z0VyZyzed/NpERqy1gL/zncCfBWOPZ3wVi1wzZ6NzXqOngnP0V kg/ZpPX6ldDcH8ujCV50Gtty7xpD61COYSKQP1LKhX/saryziOtUyJsg2nsOB19Wa94+ n5zbTiCGgh+rk1kTiMO5uW9KH9vvReFQ4lHic= Received: by 10.224.92.194 with SMTP id s2mr2855621qam.383.1250302922802; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.100? (CPE-65-29-54-222.wi.res.rr.com [65.29.54.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm4754392qwj.36.2009.08.14.19.22.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:22:02 -0700 (PDT) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:21:51 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908142121.51522.lumiwa@gmail.com> Subject: Re:firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:22:03 -0000 firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1 Paul Schmehl pschmehl_lists at tx.rr.com Thu Aug 13 02:16:24 UTC 2009 Previous message: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1 Next message: firefox 2.0.0.20_9,1 Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] --On August 12, 2009 8:18:55 PM -0500 ajtiM wrote: > > Hi! > When I run > > > ; > portaudit -a > Affected package: firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 > Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. > Reference: > > > but when I check above site I found: > Affects: > firefox <3.*,1 > firefox >3.*,1 <3.0.13,1 > firefox >3.5.*,1 <3.5.2,1 > linux-firefox <3.*,1 > linux-firefox >3.*,1 <3.0.13,1 > linux-firefox >3.5.*,1 <3.5.2,1 > linux-firefox-devel <3.5.2 > seamonkey >0 > linux-seamonkey >0 > linux-seamonkey-devel >0 > thunderbird >0 > linux-thunderbird >0 > > Are problem with firefox-2.0.0.20_9,1 or not, please. That port should probably be removed. It's ancient. Use /usr/ports/www/firefox3 or /usr/ports/www/firefox3.5 Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already obvious, my opinions are my own and not those of my employer. ****************************************** WARNING: Check the headers before replying I agree but for example if you want to install mplayer-plugin there are dependencies for firefox and you will have 2.0 again your disk. -- Mitja ----- http://starikarp.redbubble.com