Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:27:30 -0600 From: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting memory allocators for library functions. Message-ID: <200102261627.f1QGRU610388@guild.plethora.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:26:26 -0300." <Pine.LNX.4.33.0102261326160.5502-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0102261326160.5502-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>, Rik van Riel writes: >> No, I just disagree. It is useful for the OS to provide a hook for >> memory which is *known to work* - and that is the environment C specifies. >Send patches. I may some day. It's not very high on my priority list; I'd probably try to fix UVM first. :) -s To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102261627.f1QGRU610388>