From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 13 13:24:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA17054 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 13:24:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA17015 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 13:24:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA02020; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 13:21:06 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199803132121.NAA02020@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: "Justin T. Gibbs" cc: Damon Permezel , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A question about sys/sys/queue.h In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Mar 1998 11:05:32 MST." <199803131808.LAA15797@pluto.plutotech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 13:21:05 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Actually, inline functions will not work for the queue macros unless you > change the way you specify the "links" portion of the object. I agree > that, in general, using an inline is better than using a macro. Just speaking of the queue macros, has anyone noticed (been bitten by) the odd behaviour of the TAILQ_PREV/TAILQ_NEXT macros? (ie. they're not reflexive, and certainly not what you expect of them.) -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message