From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 12:31:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9756016A41F for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:31:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from buebo@buebo.de) Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de (natnoddy.rzone.de [81.169.145.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2467543D6B for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:31:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from buebo@buebo.de) Received: from localhost.localdomain (reverse-82-141-49-183.dialin.kamp-dsl.de [82.141.49.183]) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id jANCVllZ004314 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:31:49 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:32:04 +0100 From: "Felix 'buebo' Kakrow" To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20051123133204.99c71bba.buebo@buebo.de> In-Reply-To: References: <27dbfc8c0511220243k357aabaar96516b63203b057f@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__23_Nov_2005_13_32_04_+0100_mUcdYqdygc6_lRrx" Subject: Re: Problem with samba on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:31:53 -0000 --Signature=_Wed__23_Nov_2005_13_32_04_+0100_mUcdYqdygc6_lRrx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:08:06 +0100 Claus Guttesen wrote: > I had (unrelated) problems with samba ver. 3, some files disappeared > in the windows explorer, but were present on the samba-server, > client-connections stalled. So I downgraded to ver. 2 which works for > me. >=20 > This is on FreeBSD 5.4 release on the amd64-port. So if there aren't > fetatures in ver. 3 you need you could try ver. 2 instead. Just throwing in my 2c worth of wisdom, but afaik samba 2.* has known security problems, so I would not consider this a wise choice. Cheers Felix --Signature=_Wed__23_Nov_2005_13_32_04_+0100_mUcdYqdygc6_lRrx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Enrcypt your mail with GnuPG! iD8DBQFDhGFIh3KJlP+0/PsRAsYHAJ9RBccrkqR+7w4/72Ync1K/83XLAQCgtVLB f6NcvgVbCKEZlu8cIhfr4yI= =NgAY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__23_Nov_2005_13_32_04_+0100_mUcdYqdygc6_lRrx--