From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Wed May 17 11:09:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDE8D71899; Wed, 17 May 2017 11:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79BFE164F; Wed, 17 May 2017 11:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@toco-domains.de) Received: from [192.168.0.117] (port-212-202-156-99.static.qsc.de [212.202.156.99]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6A3D31AAF056; Wed, 17 May 2017 13:09:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r441053 - in head/databases: pgpool-II-35 pgpool-II-36 To: Antoine Brodin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201705162001.v4GK1hoQ004185@repo.freebsd.org> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <73be0bfd-1d55-68b5-c788-9b195ff2affe@toco-domains.de> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 07:51:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201705162001.v4GK1hoQ004185@repo.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:09:17 -0000 Hello Antonie, On 16.05.2017 22:01, Antoine Brodin wrote: > Author: antoine > Date: Tue May 16 20:01:43 2017 > New Revision: 441053 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/441053 > > Log: > Fix PKGBASE collision with databases/pgpool Thanks for the fix! 2 questions: - Why are pgpool, pgpool-II-30 and pgpool-II-33 not hit by this issue? - How could i have this detected earlier? make index didn't say anything. Greetings, Torsten