From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 15:01:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5737D16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:01:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358A343D62 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:00:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k08F0bcl023349; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:00:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k08F0acA023346; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:00:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:00:36 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Michael Bernstein In-Reply-To: <019f01c613d4$c3a39530$7d026496@montana9> Message-ID: <20060108155751.H22903@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <000601c6133d$0c463ba0$6500a8c0@ctusf.org> <1136619829.15229.23.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <019f01c613d4$c3a39530$7d026496@montana9> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: jasonharback , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Slade Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:01:03 -0000 > Hi group, I was just wondering if there's an advantage to running FreeBSD on > a SPARC than compared with a regular PC. Obviously the architecture is > different (CISC vs RISC). How ever you can purchase a higher powered PC box > for less money than it would cost for a SPARC. > user Opteron/Athlon64 - better than both :) AMD made RISC-like architecture that just runs i386-like code (i386+more registers and few extra instructions, while lots of mostly-unused instructions emulated). possible latest SUN processor may be comparable in speed at 100 times higher price :)