From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 15:56:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942E8106566C for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330B08FC0C for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfw7 with SMTP id fw7so2863634vcb.13 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:56:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/6CWbHAgCnFNR2Ticc5A0/N1RUmoYTN39n+0RuwsZTI=; b=EnXwAXr/Hq2IuiSO5V53vxKJXBtNAw4hoJ1kY9c9IKTmRhTgtRv8O1wEgXetGAgqcG aN0K5BLhW9iwMtHYb3NjdUb7aY4UndZS/WII6UsTojPfP5m7ZfzS9hxLAK/bFdhLeeXo trJzV5rZfy2UmVeV9/07E911ir3/yY7Ikhj/CbDN2zhj43ymO3QDdiD2ljyyFzzRf1DU eEdfzvdlfuT4TaK9ogWZzo5wZ6Npwrei0MVNSJiwmRaWXpD74f4bH8EuDPkEai7mBWlH t+1Nspa0a3eKA7U5HN8EpIwvBMhVpK6oD6bAg/w1liNzt4yFyQ+koxIbaBzmN/AArM0Q YxMg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.38.65 with SMTP id e1mr1959988vdk.110.1348761364161; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:56:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.69.33 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:56:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120916120041.391C41065680@hub.freebsd.org> <505624A9.7040508@hesiod.org> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:56:04 +0100 Message-ID: From: Tom Evans To: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: gpart is junk X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:56:05 -0000 On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> > On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Tom Evans wrote: >> >> The current GEOM configuration is available from a sysctl in machine >> >> readable format - check out kern.geom.confxml. If you are concerned > > > kern.geom.confxml is far from readable. kern.geom.conftxt is closer, > but still not anywhere as readable as bsdlabel. > I did specifically say 'machine readable'. The XML is well-formed, contains all relevant information, and is unarguably machine readable. Cheers Tom