Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:56:04 +0100 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gpart is junk Message-ID: <CAFHbX1%2BbOutXSwHbkePF11Rz7=fWD_iDpEReCqqyx7W=1u4UnQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1209270942000.4511@sea.ntplx.net> References: <20120916120041.391C41065680@hub.freebsd.org> <505624A9.7040508@hesiod.org> <CAFHbX1KjLHCHste9H4sV_kwxWT25uRHo%2BoLeL3R4xev=oR8LaQ@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1209170852200.17927@sea.ntplx.net> <BAY167-W132A828DEE55B76CE0C343AED9C0@phx.gbl> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1209270942000.4511@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> wrote: >> > On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Tom Evans wrote: >> >> The current GEOM configuration is available from a sysctl in machine >> >> readable format - check out kern.geom.confxml. If you are concerned > > > kern.geom.confxml is far from readable. kern.geom.conftxt is closer, > but still not anywhere as readable as bsdlabel. > I did specifically say 'machine readable'. The XML is well-formed, contains all relevant information, and is unarguably machine readable. Cheers Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFHbX1%2BbOutXSwHbkePF11Rz7=fWD_iDpEReCqqyx7W=1u4UnQ>