From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Nov 18 07:06:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA16574 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 07:06:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tornado.cisco.com (tornado.cisco.com [171.69.104.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA16561 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 07:06:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmcgover@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com) Received: from bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (bmcgover-pc.cisco.com [171.69.104.147]) by tornado.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.1/8.6.5) with ESMTP id KAA12583 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 10:06:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (localhost.pa.dtd.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by bmcgover-pc.cisco.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA02379 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 10:06:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bmcgover@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com) Message-Id: <199811181506.KAA02379@bmcgover-pc.cisco.com> To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Req: Feedback on Building 2.2.6 on server that needs CAM.... Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 10:06:06 -0500 From: Brian McGovern Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've been going back and forth between running a July Snapshot of 2.2.6-STABLE with CAM support, and running 3.0. The issue at hand is that I need to be able to run an Adaptec 2940U2W, hence the need for CAM support. However, one of my main objectives of this server will be to build 2.2.6 [CAM not required at this point] images with some local device drivers and enhancements. Therefore, I'm looking for some feedback as to what "makes the most sense". My options are: 1.) Use 3.0 as a server, and build an ELF 2.2.6. 2.) Use 3.0 as a server, and build 2.2.6 with -aout specified. 3.) Use 2.2.6-STABLE with CAM support to build 2.2.6. 4.) Build a machine sans the 2940U2Ws, and use 2.2.X. -Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message