From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Mar 25 15:11:19 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA17232 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 25 Mar 1995 15:11:19 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id PAA17222; Sat, 25 Mar 1995 15:11:18 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Steve Passe cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 25 Mar 95 13:41:19 MST." <199503252041.NAA22312@clem.systemsix.com> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 1995 15:11:18 -0800 Message-ID: <17221.796173078@freefall.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I think there is (to be) a sgml2[info | tex] translator somewhere in > the scheme (john f?). It was decided (after MUCH discussion) that we > could best go from sgml to whatever we needed... As much as I'm a fan of info (historical reasons harkening back to my ITS days, I suppose), I don't think that it's a very good overall documention solution. That pesky dir file requires updating everytime you add another top level subject, rather than just being able to place something in a directory and publishing the path to it, and things quickly become unwieldy. Also, as others have already said, info is somewhat arcane and really aimed more at hackers than new users. I'd be happy to see our SGML stuff be formatted into BOTH formats (since I'm an info user myself) with some creative solution for the dir file, but I wouldn't want to push it as the #1 solution. Jordan