From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 10 21:25:00 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 448009CD
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:25:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88820A6F
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:24:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 96709 invoked by uid 89); 10 Feb 2015 21:24:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.250.192?) (mg@grem.de@88.217.180.225)
 by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 10 Feb 2015 21:24:58 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: nagios vs w/uptime
From: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B466)
In-Reply-To: <4A76A371-B573-4E62-BE78-94944963FFD0@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:24:59 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E36EA56E-3B9E-4C40-B984-E7BE97F0175E@freebsd.org>
References: <54DA617A.4090309@wemm.org>
 <A3904FE0-2D03-4290-B29E-395E8C6F6F96@xcllnt.net>
 <4A76A371-B573-4E62-BE78-94944963FFD0@freebsd.org>
To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Cc: freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
 Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:25:00 -0000




> On 10 Feb 2015, at 22:17, Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>> On 10 Feb 2015, at 21:13, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> wrote:
>>=20
>> [Moving to current@]
>>=20
>>> On Feb 10, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Surprises:
>>> * nagios doesn't like w / uptime anymore. libxo perhaps?
>>=20
>> Seems most likely, although I haven=E2=80=99t seen any differences in out=
put
>> in my (admittedly limited) testing.
>>=20
>> In what way does Nagios not like w/uptime?
>> Any concrete errors, output or misbehavior?
>> Ideally: can you reproduce the problem?
>=20
>=20
> Just compared 10.1 to current, unmodified output looks the same, but pipel=
ines don't work properly:
>=20
> 10.1:
> # uptime | wc
> 1 12 68
>=20
> Current:
> # uptime | wc
> 0 0 0
>=20
> # uptime | cat
> # uptime
> 10:16PM  up 9 mins...
>=20

Adding xo_finish() to w.c line 268 just right before exit(0); fixes that iss=
ue (I don't know libxo well enough to say if this is the proper fix or just a=
 workaround, but it seems logical to me).


>=20
>=20
>> --
>> Marcel Moolenaar
>> marcel@xcllnt.net
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=