From owner-cvs-all Sat Jun 3 16: 6:41 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE9337B7F9; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 16:06:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA22039; Sat, 3 Jun 2000 16:06:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Garrett Wollman Cc: "John W. De Boskey" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/df df.1 df.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 03 Jun 2000 18:57:08 EDT." <200006032257.SAA50018@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2000 16:06:13 -0700 Message-ID: <22036.960073573@localhost> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > BZZZZZT! > > That's called `BLOCKSIZE=1G df', thank you very much. BZZZZT. You could do df -k with `BLOCKSIZE=1K df' too but I don't see you complaining about the -k flag or advocating for its removal. This is just John's shorthand for gigabytes and probably not an unexpected evolution in light of today's drive sizes; thank god we got to skip over -m for megabytes. FWIW, I didn't like the idea of another flag much either (we gonna add -g to du(1) next? It has a -k flag too) but I couldn't argue against it from a POLA or consistency standpoint (there is -k AND there is BLOCKSIZE, enough said) so, unlike you, I didn't attempt to shoot John down with some hypocritical argument and simply approved the change with a sigh. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message