Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 23:38:55 +0200 From: Milan Obuch <freebsd-ports@dino.sk> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/courier build failures on newer FreeBSD versions Message-ID: <20140525233855.6619a9d6@zeta.dino.sk> In-Reply-To: <20140525211955.GT2341@home.opsec.eu> References: <20140525213854.0d952d1d@zeta.dino.sk> <20140525201008.GQ2341@home.opsec.eu> <20140525222726.47261ae9@zeta.dino.sk> <20140525204314.GR2341@home.opsec.eu> <20140525225151.227ea602@zeta.dino.sk> <20140525211955.GT2341@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 25 May 2014 23:19:55 +0200 Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> wrote: > Hi! > > > > Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly > > > behind the times, aren't we ? > > > Yes, this upgrade is long due, but it has some issues too. > > What issues does 0.73.1 have ? Is there a list somewhere ? > Well, maybe not issues, but there are new dependencies, so that needs testing... and I like to keep number of dependencies minimal. > Frankly, courier looses more and more marketshare, as can be seen on > > http://openemailsurvey.org > But it is still relevant - being the second one, even if with some loss compared to previous year, I think. And I see nothing about smtp here, only many unknowns... do not confuse courier and courier-imap, as is often the case even on courier's mauiling lists... > Which features are available on courier which are not provided > by other MTAs ? > I can't actually make a comparison. But I like courier being the complete solution, one package covering all protocols and features (smtp, pop3, imap, http based webmail, maildrop filtering, mailing list and some others) and its configuration structure is for me relatively easy to understand. But that's personal preference, for sure. Milan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140525233855.6619a9d6>