From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 19 13:06:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA04619 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usr03.primenet.com (tlambert@usr03.primenet.com [206.165.6.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA04612 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr03.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA29936; Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:06:08 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199709192006.NAA29936@usr03.primenet.com> Subject: Re: Higher-level kernel config? To: Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com (Harlan Stenn) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 20:06:07 +0000 (GMT) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <18987.874643267@mumps.pfcs.com> from "Harlan Stenn" at Sep 19, 97 00:27:47 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I was just noticing that I have 3 or 4 customized config files here for > various FreeBSD machines, and that stuff changes in the GENERIC and LINT > files *much* more often than I change hardware in my machines. I'm curious: could there ever be a case where you would not want to include a driver for hardware that was actually in your machine? If not, then I think dynamic autoconfiguration is the way to go. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.