From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 10:55:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A896D106564A for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BABC8FC14 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (vpn-cl-163-246.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.163.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5592B8A2058 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:55:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C287F94.5070205@bsdforen.de> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:55:16 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100627 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <381214039.20100627220400@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <381214039.20100627220400@serebryakov.spb.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Early CONFLICTS detection is POLA viloation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:55:18 -0000 On 27/06/2010 20:04, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Freebsd-ports. > > I understand, that this change (ports/137855, bsd.port.mk:1.632) was made 6 months ago, but I've > noticed it only now (twice in one day!). > > Am I only person, who thinks, that this change is HUGE POLA > violation? Definitely not, I actually got abuse reported by portmgr for my very upset e-mails. I'm kinda mystified who was offended in which way, I have reread my e-mails and though they were born of my annoyance I find nothing there that would have offended me had I been at the receiving end. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?