From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 4 18:10:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F7416A548 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B988E43DDB for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:10:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D63A1FFDD4 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:10:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id B2CD41FFDD8; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 20:10:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D360D4448D6 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:06:56 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060904180515.V44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20060905022120.19c6d62d.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20060904172700.W44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20060904175127.F44392@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de Subject: Re: Where is IPSec NAT-T support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:10:56 -0000 On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote: > Maybe it is because I am including FAST_IPSEC? I have attempted to > build and use a NAT-T kernel on atleast 7 attempts now. Last of which > was a couple months ago. the patch only support kame ipsec. I guess that's the problem. Could you try it building with kame ipsec instead of fast_ipsec and let us know if that worked? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT