Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 08:38:42 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255967] ports-mgmt/pkg: pkg upgrade incorrectly reports "1 candidates" Message-ID: <bug-255967-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255967 Bug ID: 255967 Summary: ports-mgmt/pkg: pkg upgrade incorrectly reports "1 candidates" Product: Base System Version: Unspecified Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: misc Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: tux2bsd@protonmail.com This is my first bug report but it is 100% verified, I just hope I've speci= fied the right pkg in the summary... >From my testing it is independent of architechture (aarch64 vs amd64) or FreeBSD release (13 vs 12.2).=20=20 Requires a fresh install of FreeBSD, then: pkg update pkg upgrade # will report: Checking for upgrades (1 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (1 candidates): 100% This should be 0 candidates. This incorrect number of candidates is the bu= g. pkg install -f pkg #This work around to get pkg behaving again. Verification: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/pkg-upgrade-what-is-1-candidates-reprodu= cible.80139/ Fresh install immediately after pkg is bootstrapped. root@freebsd:~ # pkg update Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 6 MiB 321.6kB/s 00:19=20=20=20=20 Processing entries: 100% FreeBSD repository update completed. 28975 packages processed. All repositories are up to date. root@freebsd:~ # pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up to date. All repositories are up to date. Checking for upgrades (1 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (1 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Your packages are up to date. root@freebsd:~ # date --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-255967-227>