Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:15:27 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/asterisk Makefile Message-ID: <xzpisi3w3y8.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4034C24E.60709@portaone.com> (Maxim Sobolev's message of "Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:03:58 %2B0200") References: <200402191122.i1JBMdHd026435@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040219135233.GK35012@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <4034C24E.60709@portaone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> writes: > This is the only reason. By design of ports system, when you are > moving ports tree around you should set PORTSDIR. Please see my recent > corresponsence with Kris. You should not need to set PORTSDIR if you have a symlink in place, and pretty much anyone with any Unix experience will assume that wherever you put it, the ports tree will "just work" as long as /usr/ports is symlinked to its real location. Please fix your port and your attitude. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpisi3w3y8.fsf>