From owner-cvs-all Thu May 13 23: 7:17 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from stampede.cs.berkeley.edu (stampede.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A21D15320; Thu, 13 May 1999 23:07:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca43-212.ix.netcom.com [209.111.209.212]) by stampede.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA12963; Thu, 13 May 1999 23:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.2/8.6.9) id XAA45111; Thu, 13 May 1999 23:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 23:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199905140607.XAA45111@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: silvia.hip.berkeley.edu: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f To: billf@jade.chc-chimes.com Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: (message from Bill Fumerola on Thu, 13 May 1999 14:52:30 -0400 (EDT)) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports INDEX From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) References: Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk * From: Bill Fumerola * > cvs co -rRELEASE_3_2_0 ports * * Is there a reason we use different tags the the src/ tree? Just curious. These are not "release engineering" tags. We don't guarantee anything about the tags in the ports tree like we do in src (you move stuff around, the tags still appear in the right place, etc.). So don't give people the illusion that it means much more than just a snapshot tag that might have been screwed up in a few months after some repository copies. Or something like that. Peter gave the reason in a long mail a while ago. I'll dig it up if you are interested. -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message