Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:46:59 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <dev-null@nuxi.com> To: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static (was: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh) Message-ID: <20031126024659.GA56876@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <m37k1ox7tz.fsf_-_@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <20031125025621.453732A8FC@canning.wemm.org> <200311250311.hAP3BTCO075916@apollo.backplane.com> <20031125150700.GA48007@madman.celabo.org> <20031125201421.GB54467@madman.celabo.org> <200311252039.hAPKdBfq080963@apollo.backplane.com> <m37k1ox7tz.fsf_-_@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:08AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > As a user, I like /rescue better than the step-child that /stand/* used > to be. It's part of the world, which /stand wasn't. Except that we still have /stand. It should be shot, but some won't let it go...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031126024659.GA56876>