From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 2 23:12:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4AD16A422; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:12:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0042343D45; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:12:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k12NC91T034187; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:12:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200602022312.k12NC91T034187@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:12:09 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis To: mj@feral.com In-Reply-To: <20060202143801.A99168@ns1.feral.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, dfr@nlsystems.com, linimon@lonesome.com, wb@freebie.xs4all.nl, kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU, kensmith@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:12:47 -0000 On 2 Feb, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 2 Feb, Wilko Bulte wrote: >> >>> Better: I still *have* an LSI-11/23 with 8" SMD. And a 11/73 with SCSI. >> >> Cool! I did some of the processor design and debug work on the J11 >> processor used in the 11/73. > > Hey- you must have known Steve Teichert then. Hmn, the name doesn't ring a bell. I was working at Harris Semiconductor at the time and spent about a year working on the processor data chip implementation. I only dealt with a handful of the DEC engineers. > In any case, do you remember enough about the J11 chip to answer > questions about some of the early revs? Oh, it's only been 23 years or so ... Most of the revisions that we did on the data chip were to get the speed up to an acceptable level, though we did run into some data integrity problems. I don't know anything about the microcode history. The only non-wetware info I have from that time is a preliminary copy of the "DCJ11 Microprocessor User's Guide".