From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 9 08:03:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD6710656A4 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDCE8FC17 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA27243; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:03:50 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Otc6n-0004Mt-66; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:03:49 +0300 Message-ID: <4C8894E4.2030804@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:03:48 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100822 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Wemm References: <4C4DB2B8.9080404@freebsd.org> <4C4DD1AA.3050906@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64: change VM_KMEM_SIZE_SCALE to 1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:03:54 -0000 on 26/07/2010 22:29 Peter Wemm said the following: > > That hard limit of 512G of physical ram doesn't seem so distant anymore.. I was reviewing this thread and got curious about this statement. What is this limit? Where does it come from? -- Andriy Gapon