From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 19:29:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E26106564A for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 19:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9EE8FC08 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 19:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PWZoG-0006Vg-KJ for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:29:44 +0100 Received: from 109.227.31.204 ([109.227.31.204]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:29:44 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 109.227.31.204 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:29:44 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:29:33 +0100 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <20101223224619.GA21984@tops> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.227.31.204 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 In-Reply-To: <20101223224619.GA21984@tops> Subject: Re: [rfc] Replacing FNV and hash32 with Paul Hsieh's SuperFastHash X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 19:29:47 -0000 On 23.12.2010 23:46, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > For testing I've used dbench with 16 processes on 1 Gb swap back md > device, UFS + SoftUpdates: > Old hash (Mb/s): 599.94 600.096 599.536 > SFH hash (Mb/s): 612.439 612.341 609.673 > > It's just ~1% improvement, but dbench is not a VFS metadata intensive > benchmark. Subjectively it feels faster accessing maildir mailboxes > with ~10.000 messages : ) Try blogbench if you need metadata-intensive operations, or even fsx.