From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 20 00:24:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA19058 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 20 Mar 1998 00:24:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from trinity.radio-do.de (trinity.Radio-do.de [193.101.164.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA19009 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 1998 00:24:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fn@trinity.radio-do.de) Received: (from fn@localhost) by trinity.radio-do.de (8.8.8/8.8.5/RADIO-1.1) id JAA17558; Fri, 20 Mar 1998 09:24:41 +0100 (CET) To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Where to put source for a new ethernet card driver From: Frank Nobis Date: 20 Mar 1998 09:24:40 +0100 Message-ID: Lines: 22 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello Hackers, I am currently working on a port of the linux driver for a Schneider & Koch SK G16 ethernet card. It is an older ISA modell, but I have a bunch of them and need to support them :-/ At first I made two files if_skg16.[ch] to do the work. But the longer I tried it and took code segments from the ed driver it come to me that putting support for the SK G16 into he ed driver might be a good idea. What is your opinion about that? Should we blow up the the ed driver more and more or clutter around a bunch of standalone drivers? Regards Frank -- Frank Nobis Email: PGP AVAILABLE Landgrafenstr. 130 dg3dcn http://www.radio-do.de/~fn/ 44139 Dortmund Powered by FreeBSD Fax: +49 231 7213816 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message