From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jun 11 15:08:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA20117 for current-outgoing; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 15:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA20112 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 15:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA07223; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 15:01:26 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199706112201.PAA07223@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: vxfs (was Re: overclocking) To: toor@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 15:01:26 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, michaelh@cet.co.jp, hasty@rah.star-gate.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199706111957.OAA09630@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at Jun 11, 97 02:57:49 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Actually, it would not be a difficult port (I worked on the VXFS > > code in UnixWare a bit; I'm fairly familiar with it). The most > > difficult task would be the Vm/Cache issues, mostly because the > > new VM system is poorly documented (good code; bad docs). > > I disagree (here is my correction): > > new VM system is poorly documented (good code; NO docs). > > :-(. I'd fix this for you, if you'd avoid changing it for long enough, and promised to keep the doc up afterwards; of course, if you did that, you'd probably have enough free time that you could doc it yourself faster than I could. Probably by a wide margin, in fact, since I would have to puzzle out the meaning of the changes since the last time I was pounding away down there... ;-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.