Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 09:45:23 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Subject: Re: Missing stack frames in kgdb/ddb traces Message-ID: <XFMail.011008094523.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200110081423.aa55254@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08-Oct-01 Ian Dowse wrote: > In message <20011008214808.S17093-100000@delplex.bde.org>, Bruce Evans > writes: >> >>BTW, I think parts of the keyboard interrupt handler need to be fast >>interrupts again so that the keyboard can be used to debug infinite >>loops in the kernel like it used to be able to. Now the debugger >>hotkey always takes you to an uninteresting place in the keyboard >>ithread even if it is not blocked. > > Yeah, this was an annoying side-effect of the ithread changes. I > was delighted to discover that the serial console case still gives > a useful trace. Note that you can trace an arbitrart process (but figuring out which process to trace might be a pain) by doing 'trace <decimal pid>' such as 'trace 23' to trace process 23. Your patches look good to me though. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.011008094523.jhb>