Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:04:53 -0700
From:      Andrew Elmore <aelmore@interwoven.com>
To:        Peter Leftwich <Hostmaster@Video2Video.Com>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: lament about freebsd sacrifices
Message-ID:  <20040414190453.GI94833@interwoven.com>
In-Reply-To: <12586.63.109.229.22.1081967765.squirrel@webmail.alienwebshop.com>
References:  <12586.63.109.229.22.1081967765.squirrel@webmail.alienwebshop.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:36:05AM -0700, Peter Leftwich wrote:
> I thought I would post this as something of a warning.  Using
> FreeBSD as a primary, non-dual-boot OS means sacrificing.  Here is a
> partial list of sacrifices, as compared to Microsoft Windows XP:

<snip>

> * websites that use ActiveX (Windows) controls

I count this as a net gain.  ;-)

Andrew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040414190453.GI94833>