From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Oct 24 6:11:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0895D37B479; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 06:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 156C61908; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:11:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:11:36 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: "Scott D. Yelich" , Jeremy Lea , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Who broke "ls" in FreeBSD? and why? Message-ID: <20001024081136.K1604@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews References: <12367.972372237@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <12367.972372237@winston.osd.bsdi.com>; from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com on Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 12:23:57AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ redirected to -hackers ] On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 12:23:57AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > What's wrong with -a? And what the heck does this have to do with > mobile computing? -a doesn't disable -A, it adds to it (also shows . and ..). I think this guy's looking for an option to disable this flag.. no idea why. One could simply invoke `ls' as a normal user (say, `nobody') if they so desired. -- Will Andrews - Physics Computer Network wench To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message