From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 20 14:49:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA14255 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 14:49:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from singapore.eecs.umich.edu (singapore.eecs.umich.edu [141.213.8.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA14209 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 14:49:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from weeteck@eecs.umich.edu) Received: (from weeteck@localhost) by singapore.eecs.umich.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) id RAA27603; Tue, 20 Jan 1998 17:48:47 -0500 (EST) From: Wee Teck Ng Message-Id: <199801202248.RAA27603@singapore.eecs.umich.edu> Subject: fastintr interrupt handler To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 17:48:47 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk i've a question concerning the two different types of interrupt handler: fastintr and slowintr. i've looked at the code in vector.s, and somewhat understands what both do. i've also gathered from sio.c that comm port 1 & 2 uses fastintr. my question is: - is it safe to use fastintr for keyboard? thanks wee teck