Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:22:43 -0500
From:      David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
Subject:   Re: generalizing fd allocation code to id allocation
Message-ID:  <20090211152243.GA11468@zim.MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <200902111425.45981.hselasky@c2i.net>
References:  <4992CA63.8080601@icyb.net.ua> <4992CE1A.6060106@icyb.net.ua> <200902111425.45981.hselasky@c2i.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 February 2009, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > My nose has just been rubbed into alloc_unr(9) :)
> > Thanks, Roman!
> 
> The only problem about alloc_unr() is that you cannot allocate multiple 
> contiguous units?

Both Solaris' vmem(9) and NetBSD's extent(9) can do this...
might be worth looking into.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090211152243.GA11468>