From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 30 05:31:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC72B1065674 for ; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:31:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from smtp2.tls.net (smtp2.tls.net [65.196.224.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0448FC1E for ; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:31:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 84265 invoked from network); 30 May 2008 05:31:07 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.3 ppid: 84253, pid: 84261, t: 0.2306s scanners: attach: 1.2.3 clamav: 0.91.1/m:45/d:6125 spam: 3.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on smtp-2.tls.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=20.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.2.1 Received: from 64-184-9-72.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.1.42?) (ldg%tls.net@64.184.9.72) by auth-smtp2.tls.net with ESMTPA; 30 May 2008 05:31:07 -0000 Message-ID: <483F9115.4010903@pixelhammer.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 01:31:01 -0400 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 05:31:08 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gary Kline >> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 2:51 PM >> To: Ted Mittelstaedt >> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List >> Subject: Re: Stumped:: web HTML. Caution, may be OT. >> >> >> you probably didn't start with the earlier markup. back then, >> '93-4, there was
,

, , and . i wrote a 2.2K-line >> program to handle "hi" -> ``hi'' and a couple other things. >> the code has evolved, of course, but still works. >> > > Not the case. I use vi myself and I eschew background gifs and > such. Web pages that I create are black text on a white back > ground interspersed with images when needed. Period. No CSS no frames, no > nothing. If the content I put up isn't worth reading > then no amount of formatting, font specification, animated > images, and so forth is going to get people to look at it, > is my feeling. I nearly spit coffee on my keyboard! I agree with you 100%. When we all did HTML with BBedit and Textpad, people like Black, Tog, and Nielsen kept everyone designing websites to best serve the content. Now it is all about the sizzle, but there is rarely a steak. DAve -- In 50 years, our descendants will look back on the early years of the internet, and much like we now look back on men with rockets on their back and feathers glued to their arms, marvel that we had the intelligence to wipe the drool from our chins.