Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:04:44 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wanted: Flash player for <browser_of_choice>.... Message-ID: <443D170C.3080103@utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <200604121137.32229.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> References: <443BB35B.6050801@computer.org> <20060411204721.S35382@tripel.monochrome.org> <443C59BF.60901@computer.org> <200604121137.32229.work@ashleymoran.me.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Ashley Moran wrote: > On Wednesday 12 April 2006 02:37, Eric Schuele wrote: >> Either way... I hope somehow they see fit to loosen the language a bit >> in the future. > > Can't we petition Adobe somehow? I'm a bit stuck now - my company's main > application is written in Flash! > Petition? How about we sue them? How can a vendor dictate what platform they allow their software to run on? Just because they designed it for some other OS doesn't mean, if I can figure out a way to make it work, that they can tell me I can't run it on that platform. I'm not a lawyer either, but frankly I think their EULA is unenforceable and their attitude ought to cost them customers. -- Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ [-- Attachment #2 --] 0 *H 010 + 0 *H 00At"0 *H 010 UUS10U VeriSign, Inc.1<0:U3Class 2 Public Primary Certification Authority - G21:08U1(c) 1998 VeriSign, Inc. - For authorized use only10UVeriSign Trust Network0 990331000000Z 070114235959Z01'0%U The University of Texas System10UVeriSign Trust Network1;09U2Terms of use at https://www.verisign.com/rpa (c)991200U)Class 2 CA - OnSite Individual Subscriber1-0+U$The University of Texas at Dallas CA00 *H 0 "zھ6p`0`S/5ɨ)=d}чTxxLIA ҥ~BQNths]1)%c#Dj9FXúKzI#C2 00)U"0 010UPrivateLabel1-1400 `HB0DU =0;09`HE0*0(+
