From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 25 16:00:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FA31065692 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E97A8FC27 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7PG03fJ044120 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:00:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7PG03Ci044119; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:00:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:00:03 GMT Message-Id: <200908251600.n7PG03Ci044119@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Bruce Cran Cc: Subject: Re: bin/138146: [patch] w(1) and pkill(1) don't work on core files without specifying -N X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bruce Cran List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:00:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/138146; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bruce Cran To: Mikolaj Golub Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/138146: [patch] w(1) and pkill(1) don't work on core files without specifying -N Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:51:24 +0100 On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:17:15 +0300 Mikolaj Golub wrote: > I have noticed the same behaviour for ps utility (at least under > FreeBSD7.2). It also has _PATH_DEVNULL as default for nlistf and does > not work without -N option. There are more problems with ps(1) and crash dumps; they're all detailed in kern/137890 . I'm wondering if systat might have the same problem too, since it uses "/dev/null" but it might be intentional since it's in a failure path. -- Bruce