From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 10 18:47:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DF510656A6 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:47:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f200.google.com (mail-yx0-f200.google.com [209.85.210.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A288FC14 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:47:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by yxe38 with SMTP id 38so227865yxe.3 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:47:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fTQButXEsKSsEARosgaWXxVk9+9KcDbk2TAhU/XjJeI=; b=DF20uP1/uvyZ8Tc/z7eB52+n83ff/L9zxWBKwa0IUHr8gAR0i/YMP9ghGQdjK8KFdJ 42H91PonmCmr6nGUKzuHTSMig1tXZTA7q7voBYcyh5cuAlY7EB0QKnBfGgHtEFeCkXer nLnQyKWKbcB88FOiFHnoYXZAkz4Gi/gx1imxM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CPy7oY3JCDla2EE1/w0wsSnvrq5EOZznYXVzhARuPV5yJH35ROIa0nhIJ0uusBZxzp wx7C5MNndl6KsWWB0fpvmw8+oCdh1kQqgNEd6agOlgyeNidTkC6Uu4VIcwVBFsfZ1QeH rx/tCiIXtwlgHjazKEJjTGIIRDJ+ZSIKAnc+A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.197.7 with SMTP id u7mr1726300anf.108.1244659634411; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:47:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <539c60b90906101137v542a6185s5ffe06407759da1f@mail.gmail.com> References: <539c60b90906101137v542a6185s5ffe06407759da1f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:47:14 -0700 Message-ID: <539c60b90906101147r222a3faeg9ccf3195dc6c3d4b@mail.gmail.com> From: Steve Franks To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: devd or devfs for ucom? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:47:15 -0000 On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Steve Franks wro= te: > I'm having trouble making my ucom devices public, following the > handbook (had it working on 7.0, but had a disk crash). > > So, should I be using devd.conf or devfs.rules? =A0They sure seem built > to do the same thing to me... > > Thanks, > Steve > While I wouldn't mind an answer to that question, it's actually working; however, my program that uses libftdi & libusb to talk to my ugen still needs to run as sudo to see the device - but if I run chmod 666 /dev/* (which I'm sure is a bad idea), I don't need sudo; what device is required for libusb besides ugen? The hub? Best, Steve