From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 14 01:00:23 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA22667 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 01:00:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA22661 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 01:00:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA13341; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 01:00:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from UNKNOWN(), claiming to be "current1.whistle.com" via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd013324; Sun Dec 14 00:59:59 1997 Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 00:57:20 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Terry Lambert cc: Mike Smith , bgingery@gtcs.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: blocksize on devfs entries (and related) In-Reply-To: <199712132055.NAA29304@usr06.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > One "incidental" piece of parametric information I am interested in > seeing is the physical block size. This is already propogated up.. BTW terry isn't UFS restricted to making dir entries in FRAG sizes rather than physical blocksizes?