From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 15:25:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4BDB200; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:25:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay011.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay011.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CBC437C8; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:25:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArsIAO5T+1NR8nGf/2dsb2JhbABZgw2BKtQeBAIBgSAXd4QEAQU6HCMQCxgJJQ8qHgYTiEYBwBIXj0wHhEwBBJxIlQ2DYDsvgk8BAQE Received: from 159.113-242-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.242.113.159]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 25 Aug 2014 17:24:06 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7PFO4VN042639; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:24:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:24:03 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Gerald Pfeifer Subject: Re: svn commit: r365725 - head/lang/gcc5 Message-ID: <20140825172403.7ea565bc@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: References: <201408231231.s7NCVa2w094830@svn.freebsd.org> <20140825144800.15a65f42@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Gerald Pfeifer , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:25:18 -0000 On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:15:08 +0200 (CEST) Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > Wouldn't it be better to move the port to lang/gcc50? Presumably > > the tools will also be gcc50, g++50 etc. right? > > No. :-) > > GCC changed the versioning scheme similar to FreeBSD: the next > major releases after GCC 4.8 and GCC 4.9 are going to be GCC 5, > GCC 6, GCC 7, and so forth. > > Accordingly I am planning to call the tools gcc5, g++5, gfortran5, > and gcj5, respectively (and documented this in lang/gcc5/pkg-descr). > Otherwise, we'd be changing that for bugfix releases. > > Does that make sense? Yes :) So what would have been 5.0.1 will now be 5.1 and the old 5.1 becomes 6.0.