From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 31 07:43:33 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA22896 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 07:43:33 -0800 Received: from alpha.ksu.ras.ru (uucp@ksu-ips-gw.ras.ru [193.124.148.48]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id HAA22842 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 07:42:58 -0800 Received: from vdnode.UUCP by alpha.ksu.ras.ru with UUCP id AA02317 (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG); Fri, 31 Mar 1995 19:43:59 +0400 X-Pass-Through: Kazan State University network Received: by vdnode.ksu.ras.ru (UUPC/@ v6.13beta, 12Nov94); id AA30559 Fri, 31 Mar 1995 19:04:55 +0400 To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: Organization: J.S.Co. ICL KME-CS/Russia (Kazan branch) From: "Vladimir V. Dyatchin" Date: Fri, 31 Mar 95 19:04:55 +0300 X-Mailer: BML [MS/DOS Beauty Mail v1.36h] Subject: HELP: IDP-IPX & SPP-SPX ??? Lines: 22 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 799 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello, guys! I've recently recompiled the 386BSD's kernel with Xerox NS support. I set an NS address for ethernet interface by "ifconfig ep0 ns 34H:" command (my subnet's number is 34H). Then I succesfully connected two processes on one system via sockets over IDP, but when I tried to send a packet from such a process on 386BSD to a process on a PC waiting for it over Novell IPX it didn't work - the listenning process couldn't see anything. I tried the opposite variant but everything was just the same. Could anyone tell me if IDP is compatible with IPX and SPP with SPX (I've heard it is). Maybe someone has already faced this problem. All thoughts will be really appreciated. Really waiting for your messages, Alex D. Zinin ("ICL-KME CS" JSC, Software Development Group)